top of page
Search

Was the Killing of the Cincinnati Gorilla Justified?

  • s8545594
  • Jun 3, 2016
  • 1 min read

Claim: The killing of the Cincinnati Gorilla was justified.

Evidence: "The decision to use lethal force had been a difficult one. A tranquilizer would have taken several minutes to neutralize the animal, prolonging the risk. The dart could also agitate the animal, the zoo said, and cause a violent reaction."

Explanation: The zoo security team’s saved the child’s life. If the zoo security team would've used a dart it would've caused a violent reaction. A tranquilizer would've taken several minutes to neutralize the gorilla. Their decision to use a lethal weapon was justified. The gorilla could've hurt the little boy if dragged him a little harder.


 
 
 

Comments


Featured Posts
Check back soon
Once posts are published, you’ll see them here.
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page